
The question is not about God’s definition of Love, the question is if our definition matches His….and it does not. His expression of love is beyond our ability to grasp….and it IS exclusive and has boundaries. By that I mean that, though 'He has compassion on all He has made (Psalm 145:9)' and though He 'so loved the world (John 3:16),' to participate in a relationship where you experience this kind of love is exclusive….and it will convict you of sin because you are hurting Him. If you are not in this exclusive relationship, then you are defining 'love' and trying to say that God is with you on whatever definition you’ve chosen. Because of our love, I know that there are things I can do (behavior-wise) that will hurt my wife Mollie. Just because I may like those things, or even ‘love’ them, doesn’t mean that it will be embraced by Mollie. And, most importantly, because I am in a TRUE loving relationship with Mollie, I know when something is hurting her. Homosexuality is so clearly repulsive to God, just as my drug abuse and sexuality outside of marriage (regardless of homo/hetero) was. It hurts Him, even as my rebelliousness hurts Him.
Homosexuals can be saved (praise God). They deserve love just as much as our fallen souls do. They deserve a church to be a part of just as much as the drunk that walks in every week. Those doors are supposed to be open to them, just like anyone and EVERYONE else that struggles with sin in a fallen world. But, just like all sin, it should be something that we become convicted of and begin to turn from. If a church begins to embrace sin, then it suggests that Jesus Christ has died for nothing.
